Letter to the Editor, ‘Prioritize Balance’ in Forests

The Seattle Times

Re: “Forest feud” [Oct. 13, Climate Lab]:

Recent coverage about the Department of Natural Resources’ “legacy forests” suggests that DNR is the only landowner managing extended rotation forests. As a fourth-generation owner of Port Blakely — a family-owned company that has managed long-rotation forests for generations — I am concerned by this assumption.

Our 130,000 acres in Washington ensure an uninterrupted supply of premium Douglas fir timber — year after year — forever. By growing our trees 50% longer than industry standards, we produce higher-quality wood and support a more diverse ecosystem.

Some are calling to add 77,000 acres of DNR second-growth forests to the millions of acres of protected old-growth in our region. I believe this effort is misplaced.

Washington’s landscape thrives with a diverse mix of forest types. Limiting DNR’s ability to harvest mature second-growth forests would disrupt the delicate market balance — threatening the few remaining mills that process older trees. Without DNR supply, these mills could vanish — taking with them the financial incentive for private landowners to maintain long-rotation forests.

To protect our economy, environment and communities, we must prioritize balance — supporting forest production and stewardship. The future of our industry, the livelihoods it supports, and the health of our ecosystems depend on it.

René Ancinas, chairman and CEO, Port Blakely, Seattle